Search QAs

Could you please provide me with information whether EIOPA has ever issued any statement or publication regarding the issue of demerger / spin-off of an (re)insurance undertaking?

When do you plan to publish results of the survey on European insurers on their use of generative AI? Did you do any previous studies or surveys on the use of gen AI in the field?

Since 1 January 2025, EIOPA has stopped publishing technical information for 11 non-EEA currencies. However in the Report on the calculation of the UFR for 2025, UFR values for these 11 currencies are provided, e.g. Malaysian Ringgit. In the equivalent report in 2026 and future years, will UFR values continue to be provided for these 11 non-EEA currencies?

It seems that the rules EV75-2 and EV52- are incompatible:
EV75-2: Issuer sector according to ESA 2010 should be reported for non-ISIN securities only.
--> BUSINESS(en) - [EV75-2];[isNull((t: SE.06.02.16.02, c: EC0231, z: Z0001, filter: matches([s2c_dim:UI], "^((ISIN/.*)|(CAU/ISIN/.*))")) reported as {$v1})]|
This states that the Issuer sector is not required if the asset identification is an official ISIN (no mention of CIC).

Can we get clarification on the completeness check that could be performed between entities reported in S.36.01 through S.36.07 vs S.32.01. For example, entities reported in S.36.01 C0030 (Identification code for investor/ lender) and C0060 (Identification code for issuer / borrower) should (given then should both be entities within the group as the template is reported intra-group transactions) both be included in S.32.01 C0020 (Identification code of the undertaking).

Should the C0010 "Legal name of reinsured undertaking" be filled regardless of group consolidation method used?

Having in consideration the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part, published on 14.01.2017 in Official Journal, the insurance companies licensed in Canada to provide insurance services, can based on FOS or FOE from IDD to provide such services also in EU countries?

We have a question regarding the application of the CIC code in QRT S.06.02 for UCITS funds. In the context of QRT S.06.02, when we report a UCITS fund (for example, a French-domiciled UCITS fund), should we use the country-specific CIC (such as FR41) or XL41 for these instruments?

Applying the look-through approach as in Scheme S.06.03.04, we do not have information on the sector to which the corporate-type constituents belong (“Underlying Asset Category” = 2). With reference to Sections F.10.4 and F.13.4 of the RFR Technical Documentation, should I consider these exposures as corporate exposures, even though the sector is not specified? And, if so, should I exclude them from allocation to the sector by distributing the respective share between the “financial” and “non-financial” asset categories, as with the credit quality steps (F.14.2)?